My process has evolved as I have learned more about writing. I've had a few false starts, taken a few steps forward, a few steps back, and modified my work flow. Story Engineering has had the greatest impact on my process, simply because it has given me a process that ensures my story, assuming it is compelling and well written, will meet the expectations of agents, publishers, and readers. That doesn't mean I will get published. There are too many other factors to assure that. But, it does mean I will have adhered to the principles of story telling that readers expect.
My process used to be to do an outline and beat sheet, with my scenes identified. I did a lot of thinking about the story and characters. I outlined the book from start to finish, understanding it would change and evolve as I wrote, discovering scenes that didn't work, creating new scenes, maybe even introducing new characters. It was a pantser approach based on a skeleton outline and beat sheet. Larry showed me how to put meat on that skeleton. I have already started working on a follow up to my first book, and it is a joy to have the tools and knowledge to identify the plot points, pinch points, and establish a cohesive structure that holds it all together, and gives me a framework for writing the story.
Here's a couple of things I would encourage you to do:
- Download a sample copy of Story Engineering from Amazon, better yet, just buy it.
- Check out Larry's Blog site at storyfix.com.
If you are open to an insightful, comprehensive process for creating your story that meets the expectation of readers, agents, and publishers, it will change your writing life.
Hi John:
ReplyDeleteI stumbled across your blog via your comment at Larry's site. I have just been reading Story Engineering and feel it has immensely helped me as I rewrite my WIP. In fact, as I headed into yet another "pantsed" draft, unsure what to cut and what to keep, I found analyzing what I had in terms of his story physics model simplified my story and highlighted a lot of the weak spots. I think an apt analogy was my story had lots of narrative flesh but not bones -- it couldn't stand and it sure couldn't run.
I'm seriously considering his $100 12-page analysis service. Glad to read you found it a helpful experience.